Do Pain and Struggle Constitute a Fundamental Part of Love?

B&W and Red All Over B&W and Red All Over (Practice) B&W and Red All Over (4today)

Artwork by Tonia Davenport—from her wonderful series “B&W and Red All Over”


A while back, I read this relationship break-up anecdote at Galleycat, from a poetry-devoted reader:

The book was a collection of love poems by William Carlos Williams. The poem was “Asphodel, that Greeny Flower.” And the specific line of the poem over which we disagreed was: “I cannot say that I have gone to hell for your love but often found myself there in your pursuit.”

Although my boyfriend and I had been dating seriously for about a year, we disagreed so vehemently about whether pain and struggle constitute a fundamental part of love that we decided to break up then and there after reading and discussing the poem.

When I shared this with The Conductor, he responded, “Who wouldn’t agree that pain and suffering are a fundamental part of love?” Then he argued that whoever did the breaking up in that relationship was the person who felt real pain in it—and was resentful the other person seemed to think it was all happy-fun time.

So I started to wonder: How can a person see love as something free from struggle? Theories:
  • Is it an ideal vision of love where it transcends pain?
  • Does it assume that ideal partners (if such a thing exists) do not struggle, have conflict, or hurt each other?
  • Is it a very Zen idea of love, where there’s a level of detachment that makes pain and struggle impossible? (Such thinking is absolute folly, but that’s a post for another day.)

Every relationship I’ve experienced has been different—always a new dynamic, a different type of understanding. Whenever you bring two people together, you have unique energies, patterns of behavior, and hang-ups.

I don’t really believe in true, soul-mate love. I do believe in love at first sight (though I differentiate it from true love). Either way, I can’t imagine any meaningful relationship free from pain and struggle.  The one constant with anyone you love is that you have the ability to hurt each other, and you know exactly where to aim and how deep. Or, in the words of Leonard Cohen, “All I ever learned from love was how to shoot at someone who outdrew you.”

You do get better at it, I think. You get more mature. You drop the Hollywood, Disney-fied, cultural fantasies that create hang-ups.

Most of all, you practice gentleness and kindness, which takes strength. But the relationship hasn’t actualized until you’ve hurt each other.

“Whenever you’re in conflict with someone, there is one factor that can make the difference between damaging your relationship and deepening it. That factor is attitude.” (William James)

Posted in Life Philosophy, Love, Reading.
Jane Friedman

Jane Friedman

Jane Friedman (@JaneFriedman) has 20 years of experience in the publishing industry, with expertise in digital media strategy for authors and publishers. She is the co-founder and editor of The Hot Sheet, the essential newsletter on the publishing industry for authors.

In addition to being a columnist for Publishers Weekly, Jane is a professor with The Great Courses, which released her 24-lecture series, How to Publish Your Book. She also has a book forthcoming from the University of Chicago Press, The Business of Being a Writer (March 2018).

Jane speaks regularly at conferences and industry events such as BookExpo America, Digital Book World, and the AWP Conference, and has served on panels with the National Endowment for the Arts and the Creative Work Fund. Find out more.

Join the conversation

14 Comments on "Do Pain and Struggle Constitute a Fundamental Part of Love?"

Notify of
avatar
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
trackback
World of Islam » Blog Archive » Religious tensions in the suburbs

[…] Do Pain as well as Struggle Constitute the Fundamental Part of Love? | Jane … […]

Tonia Davenport

If we're talking about theories (versus the difficult reality of actually trying to practice what we want to believe in), I think that there is a solution to suffering and it comes from two things: sufficient love of self–first–and from that follows unconditional love. As long as we look to another person, be it a relative, friend or romantic partner, to fulfill any one of a number of different needs, we will always experience suffering. It's extremely hard to get to that place of being able to love without strings attached. But it's a noble goal.

Sammie
Speaking of love and attachment, I was up until 2 am last night with a sick cat who may not live. I love this cat with all my heart. He adores me in his cat-like way. We've had eleven years together, but it's still hard to give him up. On the human side, a person is now part of my daily life, yet I'm not sure I can trust him. I recently decided there's no use holding back and trying to love him halfway, saying, in effect, “I'll only love you if I sure it's safe.” It needs to be… Read more »
Annie Syed
my favorite quote on love and relationships is as follows: “To love is a beautiful, mysterious event; do not miss it. Be neither too cautious nor too absorbed. Too many of us reason with our hearts and experience with our heads. It can not be so. The heart knows no logic beyond need and desire; the head has no senses except the common and the pragmatic. Neither, frankly, is particularly useful in love, anyway.Rely on your sixth sense, that little voice within. There is no preparation or protection from the joy and pain of relationships. They are inseparable twins. One… Read more »
Jada Bradley

Letter to Zenzele is a wonderful and amazing book and I am always happy to know it is being read.

Angela Parson Myers
I don't believe suffering is necessary to love, but I do believe it's common to it. Love is the most amazing emotion a person can feel. It's completely illogical to make yourself that vulnerable. And when you're that vulnerable, you will be hurt sooner or later–to what degree depends on the object of your affection and your own psychological condition. Yet it remains the ideal state of most of humanity. And it's worth it. It boggles the mind.I do believe in soul-mates because I've been married to mine for nearly 47 years. That said, being soul-mates doesn't mean you don't… Read more »
jeannevb
I wish I believed in soul mates. If I did, then I'd have to take far less responsibility in the success or failure of my choice in partners. It would simply be fate. Fate does bring people into our lives, but if we aren't prepared to meet them, even if it IS a “soul mate”, the relationship is doomed. I've watched many a divorced friend fail the second, third and fourth time around. The reason? They didn't love themselves enough to have a healthy relationship. They put all their hope and dreams into another person's acceptance making them feel good… Read more »
jeannevb

I just shared that sentiment with my teen girl. I suspect this generation will make different choices *fingers crossed*

wpDiscuz