Beware of Chapter-by-Chapter Book Critiques

Image: wooden sign on urban sidewalk, painted with two arrows; the arrow pointing right is labeled 'Awesome' and the arrow pointing left is labeled 'Less Awesome'
Photo by Jon Tyson on Unsplash

Today’s guest post is by writer, coach and editor Lisa Cooper Ellison (@lisaellisonspen).


As an editor and coach, I’m frequently asked by writers when they should level up from free and low-cost feedback (critique groups, webinars, and classes) to more expensive forms of feedback (workshops, private editors, even MFA programs). Some are newbies who don’t understand the feedback landscape. Other writers have been burned by overly critical MFA programs, bad editing experiences, or critique group dramas—and they’ve learned that while some mistakes hit your pocketbook, the costliest ones can damage your manuscript.

Often these problems have one common cause: You’ve asked the right question of the wrong person.

My biggest feedback blunder happened in the fall of 2006. I’d recently finished a novel draft. Not knowing the next steps, I contacted a former mentor for assistance. He referred me to a group of talented and motivated MFA hopefuls. They largely focused on shorter portfolio-related pieces but agreed to add my novel to the workshop schedule—one chapter every six weeks.

I left the first workshop eager to tackle their suggestions for the setup and character development. But during workshop two, they contradicted their original suggestions and asked tangential questions. Not wanting to appear defensive, I bit my tongue every time I wanted to say, “I’d love to know if you still felt that way after reading the entire book.” Despite my reservations, I continued to revise based on their advice.

Four months later, workshop three finally arrived. All I wanted was a big-picture assessment of my narrative arc. Instead, I received more well-intended chapter-level advice, tangential queries, and questions about things addressed later in the book. Workshop four included more of the same. By this point, all that revising toward their tastes and curiosities had caused me to lose sight of my original vision for this book. I also realized it would take two more years before they finished reading my novel.

Right before workshop five, I abandoned the manuscript.

I’m not the first, nor will I be the last, writer whose work has been shelved by unhelpful workshop feedback. Over the years, I’ve watched authors who submitted book chapters to classes and conference-level workshops stoically nod and clench their jaws when the majority of the questions asked were irrelevant or answered in other parts of their books. Many gently cradle their three-inch piles of feedback to a spot on their desk. Some never look at it again. Others spend months fretting over what to do with it.

There are a few reasons workshops and critique groups fail to adequately serve book-length projects. Leaders might not know how to serve long-form pieces in classes or groups designed for the short form. Many writers don’t understand concepts like the three- or five-act structure, the hero’s journey, or how to critique something based on where it falls in a manuscript. If the author doesn’t have these skills, they might not be able to ask for what they need or know how to weed out well-intentioned but unhelpful feedback from items that actually need to be addressed.

So how do you solve this problem?

You can still get something out of a chapter critique if you submit a well-crafted synopsis along with your excerpt. But don’t be fooled by a person’s pedigree. Someone can be an expert in one form of writing and not have the skills required to help you achieve your goals. Know your group and ask for what you want.

Critique groups can provide invaluable support along the way by normalizing your experience, cheering you on, and keeping you accountable by requiring you to submit something for review. But beware of chapter-by-chapter critiques that happen over months or years. They’re unlikely to help you understand or revise your narrative arc—especially if you’re still writing the first draft of your manuscript.

If you need big-picture advice on a book-length manuscript or a high-profile piece, hiring a professional is likely your best option. But you don’t necessarily need to pay for a full review—especially for an early draft.

If I could do it all again, I would:

  • Read Allison K Williams’ soon-to-be-released book Seven Drafts: Self-Edit Like a Pro from Blank Page to Book, and then revise my novel to the story draft.
  • After the book was ready, I’d hire a developmental editor or coach to read the synopsis and the first twenty-five pages of my manuscript so they could assess my setup and any skills I needed to work on.
  • If I needed to learn new skills, I might take a few classes then submit the revised beginning to my critique group. While working on my skills, I would also ask the editor or coach for a chapter summary review of the entire manuscript so we could assess and strengthen the project’s narrative arc.

Sometimes hiring a professional isn’t in your best interest.

Coaches and editors can teach you many things, but their services can be costly. Plus, there are certain skills you can only learn from working with a group.

Reading and critiquing workshop submissions can help you see what does and doesn’t work in a manuscript. As you train your brain to think like an editor, you’ll begin to implement these lessons in your own writing. This is something Jeremiah Chamberlin talks about in his Glimmer Train essay Workshop is not for you.

Plus, a group of talented peers who cheer you on and support you through this process might inspire you to up your game. If you’re working with skilled writers you enjoy working with, you might find some potential critique group partners or beta readers. While suggestions from the wrong source can stymie your progress, they don’t have to destroy your manuscript.

Parting advice

While you’re working on your draft:

  • Spend time learning about the feedback landscape.
  • Learn the skills that will turn you into a great writer.

Before you seek feedback:

  • Assess your budget.
  • Identify what you need.
  • Ask the right person or group.
  • Use the skills you’ve learned to assess your feedback.
  • Revise with an eye toward your original vision.
Share on:
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

6 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Maggie Smith

I would also offer a suggestion for a service called The Spun Yarn (that’s the one I know about – there may be others like it) for $499 they have 3 people read your entire manuscript and you get back a 30 page report on a whole host of things. They ask the readers for detailed feedback at the 1/4, 1/2, 3/4 and at the end – it’s qualitative as well as quanitative in that they critique your plot, your characters, your pacing, etc – and you can specify the age, gender, educational background, geographical area of the readers to home in on your target audience. Ask anyone that’s used them – they get glowing reviews every time and are a good alternative to the long drawn-out critique groups which, I agree, are much better for short stories, essays, poems, not novels. .

Lisa Cooper Ellison

Yes, there are many services writers can access to bypass the drawn-out critique. I’m not familiar with The Spun Yarn, but I’m glad they have reviews. It’s so important to get recommendations from trusted writers you know. While there are many great services out there, sometimes profits (as opposed to writers and their projects) are a business’s central focus. As writers, we need to choose wisely. 🙂

David Hansard

A few years ago, because I was unable to find a suitable critique group, I set up my own. My group. My rules. Minimum submission length:40 pages, or a complete short story. That helps avoid the complaint that something isn’t clear in the first chapter when, in fact, that was intentional, and clarity would be provided in due time. Instruction: Read it like you’re an airplane. The premise was that we were interested in “big muscle” issues, i.e., plot, character, plausibility, believability, and most importantly, coherence and clarity. Are you, the reader confused or disoriented? Which often relates to the author assuming critical information is understood when it’s not. Or, the flip side: Has the same point, the same information been repeated to mind-numbing redundancy? And no nitpicking. Most of the things that get nitpicked prior to the final draft are subject to multiple revisions and often ultimate deletion.

I moved and had to leave that group behind. In the new place, I found a group that met near my home, and sat in on one meeting. There were nine or ten in the group, and each session each writer submitted ONE page. The group would pour over every submission in meticulous detail, down to choice of adjectives and sentence structure. Goodbye.

Critique groups can be not only destructive to someone’s writing, but to their entire psyche. One woman joined my group who ended up making another woman cry because of her viciousness. I told her she had to leave the group because we just weren’t up to her standards. Another friend, who lives in Wyoming, joined the only critique group he could find. He was writing full-length novels and the group turned out to be “cowboy poets.” They were so nasty, he said, if he’d gone to a second meeting and taken their advice he would have quit writing. He now has over twenty published novels, eight have made the NYT bestseller list (several hit #1), and one of his series is now in prime-time on a major network. Another will be on cable in the fall. Beware the critique group.

Last edited 3 years ago by David Hansard
Lisa Cooper Ellison

Thank you for sharing your experience, David. It sounds like you ran a very productive critique group with clear guidelines and expectations that matched the stage writers were working in. That’s an essential part of running a productive critique group.

The others you mention sound like they were not a good match for you or the other writer; however, it’s possible that those groups worked perfectly for those who attended regularly. It’s all about knowing what you need and then asking the right people to give it to you. As you said in your post, the stake are high –damage not just to your manuscript but to your psyche.

trackback

[…] Lisa Cooper Ellison advises writers to beware of chapter-by-chapter book critiques. […]

trackback

[…] Continue reading HERE […]