4 Reasons to Spend Time with “Bad” Books

Today’s guest post is by author Susann Cokal (@CokalSusann), whose latest novel, Mermaid Moon, is out now.


We’re all so judgy. We peer at storylines and dialogue lines and individual words, and we snort when a writer makes a choice we wouldn’t have made. We snort even more loudly at ourselves, those times when we just absolutely hate what we’ve written and think the author (Me! I’m the author!) must be an idiot. And then we’re stuck. So maybe we turn to someone else’s book for inspiration. Someone else’s good book. And then we’re more stuck than ever.

Over and over, we’ve heard that we need to read the best books first, learn from them, and apply the lessons to our own work. Never waste time with books you know you won’t like, ones that aren’t at the very pinnacle of your chosen genre or category.

This advice, like all advice, isn’t right all of the time. If the best is all you are reading, you’re limiting the sense of what writing is. You’re limiting yourself.

Here’s a wrinkle: Books you don’t like can be great teachers too. And when you’re really blocked and despairing, a bad book might give you just the help you need.

Here are four reasons why.

1. “Bad” writing refines your personal aesthetic.

When you’re reading a bad book, it’s okay to let your nasty inner editor (let’s call her Judy) go to town. Let her eviscerate that best-selling whodunit with the plot holes a mile wide; she needs to get it out of her system. Dan Brown and Danielle Steel can take it; they have plenty of fans who love their work. Judy’s field day will give you a little break, and you’ll learn just as much from identifying what you don’t like as from what you do.

A gentler Judy can also show up to your workshop group and make it useful even when your writing isn’t up for discussion. By helping others identify weak spots in their work, you and Judy sharpen the eye with which you’ll read your own drafts later for revision. Being a discerning critic doesn’t mean you loathe the story or the writer, and you can honestly applaud the way each piece succeeds within its own parameters. As long as your comments are politely and helpfully phrased, it’s a win-win (a phrase often used in bad books).

2. A bad book can give your mind freedom in which to relax and explore new possibilities.

Maybe you feel a bad book doesn’t deserve your full attention. That can be a boon to you too. When you’re not reading with 100 percent full focus and trying to squeeze every last lesson out of the book in front of you, your hard-working creative mind might take Judy’s hand and wander down a different path—and bring back something that helps you solve a problem in your story.

In short, bad writing might inspire you.

If you want to learn from Jennifer Egan but you’re having trouble sustaining both lyricism and a plot, try reading the latest in the Harlequin line and let the structured approach to storytelling give your overly busy creative mind a little rest. The hit-all-the-marks-right-on-schedule plot might help you subliminally with yours too. I neither confirm nor deny having done this.

Which leads to the more conscious choices in Reason Number 3.

3. Bringing in tropes from different types of writing can inject new life into yours.

In recent decades, it’s become legit for literary writers to dive openly into genre writing—science fiction, comic books, pulpy mysteries, the stuff your college professors and their own Judys probably sneered at—and come back up with a long, rich novel inspired by the themes, structure, and language of those genres.

Think of Nobel laureate Kazuo Ishiguro’s riff on detective stories in When We Were Orphans, or Margaret Atwood’s post-apocalyptic Oryx and Crake, Susanna Clarke’s best-selling Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell, or MacArthur genius Octavia Butler’s seventeen books of science fiction. Where would they have been without Agatha Christie, H. P. Lovecraft, Jack Finney, and now-forgotten writers whose words swelled the pages of magazines with names like Le Zombie, Analog, and Alfred Hitchcock’s Mystery Magazine?

And even way back when, now-canonical literary writers were already adapting genre tropes and tricks. For every House of Mirth that Edith Wharton wrote, she penned a half-dozen routine ghost stories; we just don’t hear much about them because they are, yes, “bad.” F. Scott Fitzgerald stepped into fantasy with his short stories “A Diamond as Big as the Ritz” and “The Curious Case of Benjamin Button.” Virginia Woolf told ghost stories too.

So the line between good and bad may not be so sharp after all. Which brings us to:

4. The definition of a good book can change. You might change it.

Writers we worship now may not have been so highly regarded in the past. I’ll give three examples: For one, Charles Dickens was the most popular author in Victorian England, but when he died, critics fell out of love with his work, even calling it “dull and wearisome.” For seven decades his reputation languished, until in 1940 George Orwell and other fancy-schmancy literary types started praising his work. Now it’s taught in just about every high school and college in the nation.

Zora Neale Hurston wrote one of the great novels of the last century, Their Eyes Were Watching God—and the world’s Judys took over thirty years to recognize its greatness. The book fell quickly out of print, to be rediscovered during the black and feminist movements.

Mid-century British author Barbara Pym published six sparkling novels of manners between 1950 and 1961, but when tastes changed, she couldn’t find a publisher. Then in 1977 she was named one of the most underrated writers of the century, and suddenly she was the It Girl. Fortunately she had never stopped writing and had several novels lined up and waiting. She fell out of favor again in the nineties but is back again now, thanks in large part to her devoted following in the Barbara Pym Fan Club.

Now it’s impossible to imagine a world in which Hurston, Dickens, and (sometimes) Pym aren’t considered to be among the great writers of the canon, that sometimes fusty list of things everybody should read. And if no one had looked back at authors deemed trivial (Pym), clumsy (Hurston), or all flash, no substance (Dickens), we wouldn’t have those books—or the thousands inspired by the writers who’ve read them.

So maybe you’ll be the one to bring a beloved writer into the canon. Maybe you’ll be that writer.

Posted in Guest Post, Writing Advice.

Susann Cokal is a moody historical novelist, a pop-culture essayist, book critic, magazine editor, and sometime professor of creative writing and modern literature. She’s the author of several novels, the latest of which is Mermaid Moon (Candlewick Press). Her first young adult book, The Kingdom of Little Wounds, received a silver medal from the American Library Association. Her shorter work has been published in a variety of literary journals and anthologies, such as Electric Lit, Prairie Schooner, Writers Ask, and The New York Times Book Review. She lives in a creepy old farmhouse in Richmond, Virginia, with seven cats, a big dog, a spouse, and some peacocks that supposedly belong to a neighbor. Learn more at her website.

17
Join the conversation

avatar
12 Comment threads
5 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
11 Comment authors
Vivienne SangJean E JonesJudith Geltsusann cokalLaurie Recent comment authors

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
julie brown

Came at just the right time… I’ve been slogging my way through a “bad” book and really want to quit. But now I’ll finish it with new perspective and an open mind to learning. Thank you Susann!

Don Maker

I confess, I can rarely make it all the way through a “bad book”. However, I learn a lot from reading books I did not enjoy, mostly from asking myself what bothered me about it. It’s just like learning how to play a sport or a musical instrument: There are certain bad habits you should avoid. As to being judgmental, that is a necessity of life. If we don’t make good judgments, we will soon find ourselves in deep trouble. Cheers.

Kathy Steinemann

Ha! Thanks, Susan. My first thought when I encountered your mention of the inner editor was Judge Judy. Now there’s a woman who knows what she likes — and doesn’t like.

You’re right. The definition of a good book can change. It changes every time I read a book that inspires me.

Niran Sabanathan
Niran Sabanathan

The greatest benefit of a “bad” book is finding out what bothers me about it, what would I change. It creates a learning opportunity to find out what I prefer, how my mind works, and what things I would like to avoid in my own writing. A “bad” book is like peaking behind the curtains of the story beneath the story and not being seduced by the glamor – it can be even more instructive than a “good” book. I still would not finish reading it.

Karla Brandenburg

Great post! Reading a “bad” book can help me see flaws in my own writing and do better.

trackback

[…] Susann Cokal: 4 Reasons to Spend Time with “Bad” Books […]

Laurie
Laurie

Ouch. As a romance writer, I cringed that you listed a Harlequin romance book as an example of a “bad” book, or not as good as a Jennifer Egen book, even though you (sort of) praised its “hit-all-the-marks-right-on-schedule plot”. I’d like to put forth that all good novels have plot structure that hits all the right marks at the right points. I find romance harder to write, since I have to show not just a character arc for both characters, but an arc for their relationship, as well as an internal and external plots.

susann cokal

Hi, Laurie–I’m so sorry my wording induced a cringe, and I’m glad to have a chance to (I hope) correct the impression I made. I didn’t intend disrespect. By putting “bad” in quotation marks, I meant to indicate that the books themselves aren’t actually bad but that a given writer has judged them as “not my thing,” “not what I’m going for,” “not my aesthetic,” “not what I like.” I used a shorthand, and it seems to have off as dismissive in a piece meant to celebrate digging into the genres and writers we usually don’t read, no matter what… Read more »

Judith Gelt

Thanks, Susann. You make perfect sense here. I’m glad this increases my reasons for reading varied titles without counting Amazon stars!

Jean E Jones

This was great! I just finished a “bad” book last night, the disappointing climax to an acclaimed quartet. The first two of the series got my attention and I wanted to know more about what the author thought of the subject, but her final solution was unworkable. So it’s time for Judy to explore why, like Miss Marple. Thanks for the post, and thanks for the list of works to explore.

trackback

[…] You can check out her post, “4 Reasons to Spend Time with “Bad” Books,” here.  This is one of those posts that I’m writing not because she is wrong but simply because I […]

trackback

[…] we need to find inspiration to keep the creative flow going. Susann Cokal lists 4 reasons to spend time with “bad” books, Eldred “Bob” Bird enjoys coloring with words, and Judith Briles suggests we try […]

Vivienne Sang

The thing is, tastes in writing change. I am currently ploughing my way through Jane Austin’s Persuasion. If she wrote in the same manner today, she would be panned, I think. Long, complex sentences, sometimes taking almost a whole paragraph: many, many semicolons: telling, not showing: info dumps: passive voice: adverbs: etc. Yet she is considered a great writer, and is taught in schools. Dickens, I find easier to read. Austin’s stories are good, though. Far be it from me to designate a book by Miss Austin as a ‘bad’ book–I wouldn’t dare, but for me, this one is hard… Read more »