3 Traps That Subvert Our Ability to Accept Feedback

Image: hands of a large Buddha statue
Photo credit: ostensiblyclear on VisualHunt.com / CC BY-NC-ND

Today’s guest post is by writer, coach and editor Lisa Cooper Ellison (@lisaellisonspen).


When soliciting feedback on their creative work, many writers focus on hiring the best editor or finding a trusted critique partner or group. With just the right feedback, or so you believe, you can progress to a publishable manuscript.

However, years of writing and coaching writers have taught me it’s equally important to be mentally prepared for feedback. And few writers receive counsel on what it means to be ready. Here are three traps I’ve encountered that you may recognize too.

1. The Green Light Trap

At twenty-one, I participated in open mics where friends cheered my inevitable literary fame. Buoyed by their praise, I joined a writing group that met at the public library. As a college dropout who’d yet to take a creative writing course, let alone a writing workshop, I expected everyone to fawn over my brilliant stories. I mean, how could my friends be wrong?

At the first meeting, writers twice my age silently read my short story while I internally screamed, “Just tell me how much you love it!”

Eventually, the group leader said, “Clearly you have some raw talent, but you’re assuming so much, and you know what they say about assumptions…”

Not knowing what he meant, I sheepishly replied, “And what do they say about assumptions?”

His grin widened. “They make an ass out of you and me.”

That made me pull up my humble pants and get to work. It was clearly a rookie mistake, but it’s easier to fall into this trap than you might think.

Here’s why this happens:

  • You’re a new writer. Maybe most of the feedback you’ve received has come from nonwriters who love and celebrate you, but who ultimately don’t know what good writing is or how to say your current draft is a little “meh.”
  • You actually need to do more work. You hoped your critique group or even a publisher would dismiss your inner critic’s concerns because, frankly, you’re sick of revising. If that’s where you are, put the manuscript away until you’re motivated to rework it.
  • You’re asking the right people the wrong question. Like the health department, finding a problem is a workshop’s primary goal. If your gut says a piece is complete, abandon your perfectionism and send it out. If it’s almost done, ask the following question: “Can you tell me if there are any final changes I should consider?”

Before you submit your manuscript, honestly assess your skills, your project’s stage, and your level of motivation. Then ask the right questions.

2. The Bear Trap

I once heard Meghan Daum talk about the difference between confession and confiding in memoir. When we confess our life story, we hope someone will bear witness to our experience and perhaps absolve or comfort us. Author David Chrisinger calls confessional drafts half-cooked stories because the writers don’t yet know what they mean. When we confide, we let readers in on an experience we fully understand.

As readers, we might not be able to tell the difference between a fully cooked draft that needs a few more rounds of revision and a half-cooked confessional that’s asking something we’re not prepared to give.

This trap lives inside the writer, not on the page, so many writers don’t know they’ve fallen into it. At a conscious level, they want feedback on craft-related issues. They’re serious about their art and unafraid of vulnerability. But under the surface, what they really want is someone to acknowledge their pain.

The first clue you’re in a bear trap arrives on workshop or publication day. It can include physical symptoms of panic, feeling angry or misunderstood during what you know is a healthy critique, or regretting the decision to share or publish your work. I call the last one buyer’s remorse.

The bear trap is not just a creative nonfiction problem. Writers who base their work on personal experiences and write about topics emotionally close to the bone are also susceptible.

Here are some reasons why you might be unintentionally confessing:

  • You lack emotional distance from your topic. Emotional distance comes from the meaning you’ve made around the event and not the passage of time.
  • You had no idea how exposed you’d feel once you submitted your work. Consider sending sensitive writing to one critique partner and see how that feels before sharing it with a group or a publisher.
  • You’re a workshop newbie. Requesting feedback on a manuscript is a vulnerable act. While it’s tempting to submit high-stakes emotional material when you’re surrounded by compelling stories, as a beginner, it’s better to start with less intense work so you can focus on your craft.

Wanting someone to bear witness to your story is a normal human need. Unfortunately, it’s asking too much of a writing group. Before requesting feedback, rate how intense you imagine a critique might feel on a scale from 1 to 10. If you score an 8 or higher, proceed with caution.

3. The Lottery Ticket Trap

You’ve been writing and submitting for a while. The silence and isolation are getting to you. Wondering if you’ll ever achieve your author dreams, you send out one more thing to your critique group or yet another publisher, hoping for a little praise.

You want confirmation that you’re not wasting your time, even if a piece isn’t quite finished or the publishing world has yet to acknowledge you.

Here’s the problem: You’ve sent your writing to the home of here’s what’s wrong and no. Maybe you know this and hope that successfully navigating this gauntlet will confirm your talent and potential for literary wins. Sadly, this rarely happens.

How did you end up here?

  • The results of your queries have been crickets or rejections.
  • You’ve lost your writing mojo and hope external validation will return it to you.
  • You’re going through a personally difficult time, like a loss, the anniversary of a loss, or maybe a pandemic, and believe a writing win will serve as a pick-me-up.

I’m navigating this last one myself. On January 29, 2021, I finished the agent-ready draft of my memoir How Not to Die: From Death to Life on a Heavy Metal Tour. The manuscript had gone through writing workshops, manuscript evaluations, beta readers, and seven full read alouds.

I felt so ready to send it out. And yet…

I needed to wait a little longer.

February 8, 2021, marked the 24-year anniversary of my brother’s suicide, a major plot point in my memoir. While I’ve worked through my grief, anniversaries can be unpredictable. In a vulnerable place, I’m likely to fall into the psychological traps that can affect even a seasoned writer’s ability to accept feedback. The submission process can feel like a form of purgatory. Lots of waiting, lots of silence, and no idea how it’s going to turn out. So on the anniversary of my brother’s death, I let myself cry, thankful I didn’t have rejections to worry about. Three weeks later, I queried my first batch of agents.

There’s nothing wrong with needing a little love from your writing peeps. But you need to ask for it, and more importantly, you need to ask the right people. To do this, follow Jessica Conoley’s advice and develop your support triangle.

Share on:
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

11 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Maz Green

Such a good article. And so true. I love how you describe the confess/confide idea. I so easily fall into all these traps. Being ready to receive honest critique is hard, but we want our work to be the best that it can be and therefore it’s essential.

Lisa Cooper Ellison

I’m so glad you enjoyed the post. When I first heard the concept of confiding and confessing I found it to be revolutionary. Oh how I’d confessed in some of my early workshops! Learning the difference helped me not only feel better about the feedback I received, but it improved the quality of my feedback. Happy writing! 🙂

Clare

I am very sorry about your brother.

And I found your article very helpful, thanks.

As a professor who writes about subjects which are my specialty, one issue that I have encountered is editors who criticize, BUT genuinely don’t know what they are talking about. Believe me, they are out there! In my experience this is tricky, because my first inclination is to put my disappointment into your category #1, and try to “pull up my humble pants.” It takes some introspection, and often some second and third opinions, for me to realize that no, it’s not me and it’s not the manuscript. It’s that my mismanaging editor has never heard of Charlemagne, and automatically assumes that nobody else on earth has either–so his admonition that I need to “explain this more” is worth pitching into the trash.

I once pitched a manuscript to a university press which gave it to referees for review … and one of them declared, “Well, I really don’t know anything about this topic,” yet then provided a critical assessment anyway. Guess how valuable it was!

If you have any comments on this sort of problem, I’d genuinely love to hear them…

Jane Friedman

Hi Clare: I’m sure Lisa will respond here, but I’ll jump in with a couple observations.

1. If you yourself are selecting the person who is giving feedback or if you have some control over that, obviously you’ll want to choose people who have the knowledge or capability to offer you meaningful insight.

2. Feedback you receive from a publisher is in a different category, because now you’re in the position of getting paid or trying to get contracted for the work. The questions you’re raising are one of target audience or market—and if you’re on the same page as the publisher regarding the book’s audience. It could be that the editor doesn’t know the market well, or that your work is for a different market than the one the editor is thinking of. If you submit to a publisher/editor that fundamentally misunderstands the work or doesn’t have the requisite knowledge for editing, that tells me that publisher is probably not the right home for your work. Or that you were quite unlucky and unfortunate in the editors or peer reviewers who were assigned to you.

Lisa Cooper Ellison

Hi Claire,

Thank you for thinking carefully about how you can apply this post to your writing life.

I think Jane has offered some great insights into the importance of finding the right fit both for feedback and publication. Unfortunately, there are times when you’ve done careful research and chosen wisely, but things still don’t turn out well. If this is what happened to you, then I’m truly sorry.

I love that you shared that your first inclination is to “pull up your humble pants,” and take someone’s feedback to heart. That’s a great realization because as you’ve found out, not every critique is valid or helpful. There are many women out there, myself included, who share this inclination, so you’re definitely not alone.

Now that you know this, you can pause whenever you get the urge to “put on your humble pants” and assess whether the feedback you’ve received is helpful, valid, and actionable. If it is, and you agree with it, then you can incorporate it into your draft. If it isn’t, then you can move on without giving the rejection or feedback too much of your precious creative energy.

I hope that helps!

Anne Green

Thank you for this article. Most insightful and timely for me just as I’m processing an editorial report on my WIP. What resonates especially for me is “The Green Light Trap” – friends and writing colleagues cheering my inevitable literary stardom based on a few random segments of what they flatteringly but without any real editorial expertise praise extravagantly. The ever-thirsty ego slurps it up and forges onward blinded to the real-world potential of the work.

Lisa Cooper Ellison

Thank you for your comment, Anne. Yes, the ego will gladly gobble up any and all flattery you receive. Now that you know this, you can keep from getting blindsided by the ego’s reactions. This will minimize disappointments and allow you to more readily implement feedback. Happy writing and revising! 🙂

Byrd Nash

Agree with the above. New writer problems is not wanting criticism of any sort, only greenlights to make them feel good.

However, one thing to point out is some critique groups aren’t interested in giving honest feedback. They are a clique, ready to savage the newcomer in order to feed their egos. I’ve been in a great in-person group and a not-so-good one.

When being critiqued, listen with an open mind, thank the person, take those comments home, and in the next week, if you feel they were valid, work on it. If you get personal attacks (usually the tone of voice is a clear giveaway – condescending, snobby, arrogant), shrug and go on with your day.

Lisa Cooper Ellison

Byrd,

You’re absolutely right. Not all critique groups are helpful, or for that matter healthy. It’s important for the writer to assess the group before sharing work with them. This is something I’m going to talk about next week when I teach Get Better Critiques.

I also love your suggestion to wait a week before implementing feedback in your manuscript. That’s exactly what I recommend.

Happy writing!

Lisa 🙂

trackback

[…] Steve Hooley discusses cleaning up the story trail for beta readers, Lisa Cooper Ellison exposes 3 traps that subvert our ability to accept feedback, and remember, when you are in need of that elusive right word, great writers simply make them […]

Thank you for adding my post to your list.